In 1965, through the Top Deck Shandy promotion mentioned in a previous post, I acquired a book by Frank Edwards called Stranger than Science,
originally published in 1959. It was based upon the author’s American radio series which
described things beyond our scientific understanding, such as Unidentified
Flying Objects (UFOs), the Loch Ness Monster and a man who suddenly disappeared
in full view of several witnesses. I’m not ashamed to admit it was a favourite which I
enjoyed enormously and devoured uncritically.
I don’t know what became of my copy, but in 1974, Book Club
Associates sent me another of the same genre: Chariots of the Gods? by Erich
von Daniken, which was a best seller on first publication in 1968. Although not
as satisfying as Edwards’ book, it covers much of the same material and has remained
on my bookshelf ever since.
The central proposition is that at one or more points in our
pre-history, the earth was visited by aliens with unimaginable powers who
influenced early human culture. We may even be descended from them.
I would dearly, dearly like to be able to believe this but,
well, let’s not kid ourselves, most of it is complete bollocks. Much of our most popular fiction, such as 2001: a Space Odyssey
and Raiders of the Lost Ark, draws upon similar ideas. It might excite your
imagination but no one else claims it to be true.
To support his proposition, von Daniken argues that ancient structures
such as the Egyptian pyramids demonstrate higher technical skills than were
available at the time they were built, and that prehistoric texts such as the bible
contain descriptions of aircraft and advanced technology. They could therefore only
have been created by extra terrestrials or by lessons learned from them.
To give just a few examples:
He claims that the Sarcophagus of Palenque in the ancient Mayan Temple
of the Inscriptions in Mexico, as drawn above on the dust jacket, shows a spaceman sitting in a rocket;
He contends that the Nazca Lines
in the Peruvian desert are the remains of spaceship landing sites built to
alien instructions;
He suggests that the biblical
account of Lot’s wife being turned into a pillar of salt when she looked back
at Sodom is actually a description of a nuclear explosion.
He believes that the Tungusta
event in Siberia in 1908 was another nuclear explosion.
The book is packed with this sort of stuff. The trouble is
that a little googling reveals that most of these things can be accounted for
by more plausible, more mundane explanations. For example, evidence strongly
suggests that the Tungusta event was actually caused by an asteroid bursting around five miles above the earth’s surface, and there are now more plausible scientific
theories of how the pyramids were built.
There are however some things in the book which seem to defy
explanation. It seems unbelievable that during the first or second century B.C.
the Greeks were able to construct a complex clock-like machine, now known as
the Antikythera mechanism, which followed and predicted the movements of the
moon and sun through the zodiac over decades. It incorporated 37 bronze gear
wheels of a complexity not seen again until the fourteenth century.
Similarly, some of the supposed UFO sightings are a mystery:
such as the incident at Exeter, New Hampshire, in 1965 when a considerable number
of witnesses – von Daniken states 58 – saw a large, glowing red flying object. Although
it has since been suggested that it may have been an in-flight refuelling
aircraft and boom, a quick online search reveals later incidents that remain
harder to explain.
What I really disliked about the book, though, is that it is
appallingly written and organised. Perhaps something has been lost in
translation from the original German, but online cross-checking of events and
phenomena reveals numerous discrepancies and inconsistencies in details, names and dates,
suggesting sloppy scholarship. Chapters supposedly on one topic jump across
other topics, times and locations. Descriptions and interpretations are blatantly
embellished, one-sided and tendentious with little attempt at balance. Some part of the
book are entertaining, but much is tedious. I have marked and supervised several Ph.D. theses in my time, and believe me, von Daniken’s stuff would fail outright.
Why did I keep it so long? I suppose I must have enjoyed it
in 1974. Not any longer. It’s going to the charioty shop of the gods. I wish I
had re-read Stranger Than Science instead.
Key to star ratings: 5*** wonderful and hope to read again, 5* wonderful, 4* enjoyed it a lot and would recommend, 3* enjoyable/interesting, 2* didn't enjoy, 1* gave up.
Previous book reviews
