Google Analytics

Monday 19 August 2024

Ashby Decoy

Family history research takes you along unexpected paths. In tracing ancestors, and their siblings, and their siblings’ children, I have come across many strange, puzzling, and fascinating things, such as old names for diseases, like phthisis, and the names of medical conditions now rare, such as erisepylis. 

One distant relative was Joshua Blackburn, whose parents’ gravestone in Swinefleet churchyard records that he died in 1872 aged 24. Following this up, I found he left a three-year-old daughter who lived until 1967. She was 97, yet her father died at 24. The chance of life. 

But it was the name of the place of his death that caught my attention: Ashby Decoy. What and where was that? You frequently see the name on maps, such as in Decoy Farm. 

duck decoy pipe, showing screens, hoops, nets, and working dog
A typical duck decoy pipe, showing screens, hoops, nets, and working dog

Fortunately, it is easier to look these things up than ever before. The word decoy is of Dutch origin. Decoys were a method of catching wildfowl. They consisted of a large pond with up to five long curving channels known as pipes running off in different directions. Flocks of ducks or other fowl flying overhead would land on the pond and be encouraged to swim along one of the pipes. The pipes were covered by hoops and netting, and gradually narrowed towards the end where the nets were dropped and the fowl caught. As ducks tend to follow foxes so they can watch where they are, dogs were used to encourage them to the pipe end. Food, whistles, and tame ducks could also be used. The reason for the choice of pipes was to allow catchers to stay downwind of the prey. Fowl caught in decoys were free of lead gun pellets. Evil. The poor ducks. They had been flying free. 

Ashby Duck Decoy near Scunthorpe

Ashby Decoy, two miles east of the River Trent, to the south-west of what is now Scunthorpe, Lincolnshire, was in the nineteenth century one of the most successful decoys in the country, catching over 6,000 ducks in some years. One day, 248 were caught. The ducks were mainly mallard and teal, with occasional shovellers, wideon, and pintails, and a handful of the rare gadwalls and gangeneys. It had a two-acre lake in ten-acres of woodland, and four pipes. It is now the site of a golf club for which the lake provides irrigation. 

The site of Ashby Decoy, now a golf club (map and satellite image)

The whole region, including Goole, Thorne, and Crowle Moors, abounded in wildfowl of all kinds until the land was drained in the 1630s by re-coursing the River Don, leaving many small lakes around which ducks and geese bred. There were also many decoys. The last avocet nest in Britain was found in the area in 1840 (although they re-established themselves around the Wash in the 1940). Blacktoft Sands nature reserve is now here at the mouth of the Trent. 

As for Joshua Blackburn, I never got round to researching him much further. Did he die by accident or of disease? You cannot spend £10 on every death certificate that might be of interest. [See addendum at end].

Did he actually live at the Decoy? It was common for hired men to live at the farms where they worked, with board and lodgings provided as part of their wages. My dad used to go to Haldenby Hall farm at Amcotts, across the Trent from Ashby Decoy, where there was a large bell that had once been used to call workers to a room with a long table where they ate their meals. 

It seemed likely that the 1871 census would provide some of the answers, but my subs have expired. Purely to round off this post, I bought that entry only. It turns out that Joshua Blackburn was not a wildfowler or live or work at the Decoy at all. He was a farmer of 63 acres of warp land to the west of the Decoy. But he sent me off on an interesting diversion back to the days when most in the area made their living from the land.

Addendum: I am informed that the Hull Daily Mail of 26th October, 1872, reports that he was killed when a large shed he had recently built collapsed on him. 

Historic decoy near Widnes in Cheshire

33 comments:

  1. Well, you educated me about old timey wild fowl decoys, thanks!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It was an education looking it up. I was fascinated. It would have taken days when you had to go to libraries and search through reference books, assuming you could find suitable references in the first place.

      Delete
  2. Yes, poor ducks. But they are very tasty.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm a vegetarian. How can you eat lovely little quack-quacks?

      Delete
    2. With a nice plum sauce and Lyonnaise potatoes...

      Delete
  3. Well, that was interesting. The only decoys I knew were the carved ones put in place to attract live ones into range. Poor ducks.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I suppose that the carved and porcelain ones are so called after the original usage. I think of wartime shipping decoys, too, and mocked up armies to mislead the enemy.

      Delete
  4. That is fascinating. The things people do and did to catch what they wanted or needed. Poor ducks indeed!
    Poor people who died so young, but they must have had strong genes to enable their child/ren to live much longer, healthier lives.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I think we both seem to like researching these kinds of things, as your own varied posts show. We are fortunate to have the time to do so.
      My guess is that he died by accident or disease. Some of his other closer relatives also lived long lives.

      Delete
  5. Yes fascinating and a good read, loved it

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you. It certainly kept me occupied looking into it.

      Delete
  6. The things you learn when you start investigating ancestral links. I have a whole new understanding of the concept of decoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I had no idea, but always thought it an odd word.

      Delete
  7. Replies
    1. I've just added a sentence that they were wild ducks that had been flying free. That's what seems so ruthless and cruel. I can just about accept hens in battery cages that don't know any other life.

      Delete
  8. Thanks for explaining what a decoy was back in the days when it seemed that the ducks and other wildfowl would keep arriving as if there was no tomorrow. One of Shirley's remaining aunties lives at Amcotts and I have been there several times.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The peace of the countryside broken only by the calls of distressed ducks. I would guess that Shirley or her relatives know about decoys and warp land being from that area - did you say once that she had a farming background? I knew school friend from Garthorpe. You still get a sense of how things once were around there.

      Delete
    2. Her father and grandfather were both farmers in the small village of Gunthorpe between West Stockwith and Owston Ferry.

      Delete
    3. Just south of this map, then.

      Delete
  9. In other words you went down a rabbit hole. This was an interesting way to catch wild fowl.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. And non-cruel too. I would be too squeamish to live as they did 150 years ago.

      Delete
  10. Thank you for explaining about decoys. I am not sure they were used in Germany, but they used pheasant farms, for instance, to provide enough shooting material for the rich men who loved nothing more than blast living creatures to smithereens. (Sorry, I'm a litte grumpy this morning.)

    As for Joshua Blackburn, I wonder how things went for his widow. If he died at 24, I assume his wife was his age or a little younger, and had to provide for their little daughter alone. She probably would not have been able to keep the farm but had to seek employment (and/or a new husband) elsewhere.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. She remarried fairly quickly and ran a lodging house in Goole, but her daughter remained single.
      If they had decoys in Germany it would have been in the wetter and marshy areas. I would have thought they did. I am permanently grumpy about people who shoot living creatures for their own entertainment.

      Delete
  11. We have several decoys and Decoy Farm names around the marshes near the coast and next to the Fens here. I am familiar with the decoy but have not seen photos before. The Dutch came over to assist with the first decoys as they were the experts hence we got the word from the Dutch.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I thought you would know about them being from a farming background. I bet Weaver does too. Wiki says it's from eendenkooi, which means "duck-cage". It was also Dutch engineers who dried out the area by diverting the River Don (Dutch River on map). They were brought in to improve the King's hunting fields.

      Delete
  12. It is a reminder how once people did really live off the land. Not a supermarket in sight. Glad to see you are a vegetarian.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. My mother's village had animals all around. People kept pigs to fatten and often slaughtered them themselves. The butcher had a pen and bought live animals and slaughtered them. It went on until the 1950s. There were slabs of meat hanging in butchers' shops until later. There was no hiding from the realities like now with everything wrapped in film.

      Delete
  13. I decided to pay back your visit and was quite interested to read about this whole decoy business! Despite being a vegan, I've hunted and cooked my share of wild game in the past, including ducks. I knew hunters would sometimes use live ducks to lure flights in, but knew nothing about these water channels. Fascinating! We always used plastic decoys. (which, of course, will be with us forever)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. As will every toothbrush we have ever had.
      Yes, I became fascinated by the decoys. Thanks for taking a look.

      Delete
  14. What a fascinating post this is, and what carnage to catch over two hundred wild birds in one day! We kept Khaki Campbells for a while (for their eggs) and know what lovely creatures ducks are - some other fowl are rather foul. We had geese when I was a child and had to walk up the drive with a stick to keep them at bay!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The old reference source I have says 97,000 were caught over a 35 year period!
      My dad used to visit farms for work, and said that ganders were the worst. They could hit hard enough to break your arm.

      Delete
  15. There is a fascinating chapter (chapter 3, as it happens) about decoys in AWB [Brian] Simpson, Leading Cases in the Common Law. It takes as its starting point the 1707 case of Keeble v. Hickeringill. K had a decoy and succeeded in an action against H who (on his own presumably nearby land) let off guns, which disturbed/deterred the wildfowl and so interfered with the operation of the decoy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Surely he was perfectly entitled to use guns if it was on his own land, unless, I suppose, he was deliberately disturbing the decoy.

      Delete

I welcome comments and hope to respond within a day or two, but my condition is making this increasingly difficult. Some days I might not look here at all. Also please note that comments on posts over a month old will not appear until they have been moderated.